Friday, September 11, 2020

Remembering Ike's Role in Making Our World

Eisenhower visiting his troops

When I was growing up, President Eisenhower was viewed in our house as a kindly old duffer who was a good general and, at best, a so-so president. As I grew up, matured and read more, I came to realize what an exceptional figure he was and how much he dominated the world we Americans have lived in. 

In his excellent book, Commander in Chief, Eric Larrabee writes of Eisenhower at war's end:

"Eisenhower's truly astonishing accomplishment was swallowed up in the victory itself. Not many really noticed, as he so often arranged it, the plece of legerdemain that had been performed. The conduct of the war had been removed from British hands so deftly that they had no legitimate cause for complaint. His policy was simplicity itself:  "he would not let either a British or an American general single-handedly," writes Martin Blumenson;  "both British and Americans had to win it together." There was going to be no mean-spirited haggling over honor or glory;  victory was going to be shared... "His real achievement," writes [Stephen] Ambrose, "was that he had won without alienating the British."  The word "indispensable" should be used with care, but no candidate has been proposed for the role of doing what Eisenhower did.

"Churchill understood. "Let me tell you what General Eisenhower has meant to us ...," he wrote to President Truman after Roosevelt had died and the European war had ended. "In his headquarters unity and strategy were the only reigning spirits. . . . At no time has the principle of alliance between noble races been carried and maintained at so high a pitch. In the name of the British Empire and Commonwealth I express to you our admiration of the firm, far-sighted, and illuminating character and qualities of General of the Armies Eisenhower."  And lastly, which no one much noticed either, the design of Roosevelt had been supplanted by the design of Eisenhower. America was not going to withdraw from European concerns as the President had wished but would embrace them as Eisenhower had learned to do. In the figure of this man we were in Europe to stay, and on this rock would be built the Truman Doctrine, the Marshall Plan, and the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, and the world we have lived in since."

Ike is a leader to look to for guidance in our own time.

Equivalency?

A friend of mine posted this meme on Facebook. He is retired military and fairly conservative. On cue, someone replied to my friend's post with words to the effect of: "but, Obama fired Mattis!" I suppose that's meant to establish equivalency and absolve Trump of the behavior Mattis found "felony stupid."

Anyway, it got me thinking and I decided to pull the thread a little. General Mattis and President Obama fell out over the Iran nuclear deal in 2013. When that sort of thing happens, the general (or senior government official) does one of two things; they shut up and march, or they quit on principle. Mattis did the latter.

What did Obama do? He accepted Mattis's retirement request, praised his service, and ensured Mattis had time to arrange turnover to his replacement and retire in a dignified manner. Since then, Obama has never uttered a bad word about Mattis. 

As Secretary of Defense, Mattis's relationship with Trump grew increasingly vitriolic. The last straw was Trump abandoning our Kurdish allies in Syria, at which point Mattis offered his resignation. Because Trump refused to see Mattis (and had refused to meet with him for some time), Mattis published his letter openly, so Trump couldn't ignore it. 

What did Trump do? He peremptorily fired Mattis and has continued to bad-mouth him since. Mattis was also allowed no time to arrange turnover to his replacement as SECDEF, which adversely impacted operations of the Defense Department. 

So, if you choose to ponder this tale of a General and two presidents, consider what "equivalency" it reveals.

Rick Rescorla COL, USA Ret. -- Hero of 9/11

I wrote this two years ago and thought it worth sharing again.

Rick Rescorla, COL, USA Ret, was unquestionably one of the heroes of 9/11. He was a veteran of both the British Army and the American Army (pictured here at Ia Drang in 1965, where he served as a Company Commander during some of the heaviest fighting). 

In February, 1993, Rescorla was the head of security for Dean Witter (later merged with Morgan-Stanley in 1997). He figured the World Trade Center, which had just been attacked by terrorists, would be targeted again and determined to be ready when it happened. He drilled employees relentlessly on evacuating the building and warned the City and NY/NJ Ports Authority, which managed the WTC, about his concerns.

After the first plane hit the WTC on 9/11, the Ports Authority announced over the PA system that all persons should remain in place. Rescorla disregarded the announcement and implemented Morgan Stanley's evacuation procedure. Because of his quick action and years of preparation, over 2,500 Morgan Stanley employees evacuated the WTC before the towers fell. It will be impossible to tell how many others followed the Morgan Stanley employees out of the building because of their example. It is evident however that Rick Rescorla's actions halved (at least) the death toll on 9/11. 

When the last employees were out of the building, Rick went back up to the Morgan Stanley offices to make sure there were no stragglers. He was making that extra effort that defines heroes when the tower collapsed. His body was never recovered. 

His is one story of heroism from that day. We should #NeverForget.