Thursday, January 30, 2020

Self-fulfilling Fear-mongering

There is a refrain coming from various pundits and opinioneers that if the Senate doesn't allow witnesses and doesn't convict Trump, that we will be on our way to a dictatorship. While their alarm may be understandable, their conclusion is immediately wrong and potentially a self-fulfilling prophecy. 

The folks who have been telling you for years that your vote doesn't matter, that both major parties are the same, that all politicians are corrupt (so why bother voting) would love it if Americans threw up their hands in despair and frustration and walked away from the polls. 

You see, some politicians are corrupt. Sometimes, the parties do act alike if they are not held to account by voters. But we -- voters -- don't need to accept that as our reality. We can do something about it, by informed voting. We can give as much thought to who we elect as our political leaders as we give to the cars we buy, or the smartphones we buy.

But if we surrender to frustration and despair; if we just decide, "Screw it, my vote doesn't matter," then our apathy may well lead to the dictatorship we're told to anticipate.

Monday, January 27, 2020

About epidemics; it's not 1918, or 1348. Don't relax, and don't panic.

The Corona virus outbreak, centered in Wuhan, justifiably has epidemiologists and health experts alarmed. It's also been a shot in the arm (groans are appropriate here) for the cottage industry that peddles over the top comparisons to the Black Death and Spanish flu. 

Because Corona viruses spread through respiratory transmission, comparisons to the 1918 Spanish flu are appropriate, to a point. The doomsayers routinely miss a big detail however, namely that it's not 1918 (or the middle of the 14th century if we want to reach back to the Black Death). 

In 1918, there were no antibiotics that might have saved patients who succumbed to secondary bacterial infections. There were certainly no antivirals that might have blunted the primary infection. Nursing care was nowhere near its current state in ability to support patients. Ventilators didn't exist. Most importantly, national and international public health systems were just getting started. Communication may have taken weeks to cross oceans and continents. Trans-oceanic cables existed for those who could afford to use them, which didn't always apply to health authorities. 

In short, a 1918 style epidemic needs a 1918 world to happen in. In 2020, we have capabilities to contain even a highly infectious, rapidly spreading disease. A bad Corona virus can kill a lot of people, and those deaths will be tragedies. But keep perspective, panic is also deadly.

Thursday, January 23, 2020

Misdemeanor (The 1787 version)

Word of the day: Misdemean (Verb, archaic): To behave badly; with a reflexive pronoun, i.e. to misdemean oneself.

A person who misdemeans himself, or herself, is a misdemeanant. What they do is a misdemeanor. 

"Misdemeanor," in 1787, did not refer to a lesser crime. It referred to bad behavior more generally. One example of a misdemeanor -- of persons misdemeaning themselves -- would be violating an oath, such as that a president takes upon inauguration, or the oath senators took as impeachment  procedures commenced in their chamber. 

To the men who met in Philadelphia in 1787, their honor and their oaths were all important. Challenging someone's honor was grounds for a duel. In an age lacking in elaborate legal sructures and catalogues of federal statutes and codes, being a misdemeanant, committing a misdemeanor, was serious stuff and as bad or worse, maybe, than committing "high crimes." Honor was at stake, for the person, for the institution, and the country.

Those who revere the Constitution and its framers need to focus on the word, misdemeanor, and what it meant then; what the framers' "original intent" was. And, they -- we -- need to consider what it means when the person sitting in the oval office lies the way most of us grow fingernails. We need to consider what the framers' would think of Senators and Congressional Representatives who put party ahead of patriotism, or worse, put one man's ego and ill-temper ahead of the Republic. 

Saturday, January 18, 2020

No, Virginia is not going to take your Guns. But home-grown, Putin-inspired terrorists may take your country.

https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/jan/17/virginia-lee-carter-school-strike-bill-guns

I hope a lot of people will read the article at link. 

Some key points: 

1. Virginia Delegate Lee Carter's life has been threatened because some conspiracy-minded folks completely misinterpreted a bill he wrote to protect teachers' right to strike. 

2. It doesn't matter if Lee Carter is a Socialist (or Democrat, Republican, etc); he was duly elected to his office in the Virginia legislature. When we start threatening legislators' lives because of positions they take (or--in this case--we mistakenly think they take), how different are we from ISIS, or brownshirts, or the Red Brigades, etc. 

3. Lee Carter *opposed* legislation that would restrict sales of military-style semi-automatic weapons in the Commonwealth; a point apparently missed by folks who jumped on the bandwagon and are  threatening his life. 

Some additional thoughts: 

Virginia Governor Northam has temporarily prohibited carrying weapons, including firearms, within the state's capitol complex. This is a protective measure in response to social media activity calling for violence against Commonwealth lawmakers. Most states have similar laws and they aren't temporary measures. The federal government has even stronger prohibitions on carrying weapons into government buildings. 

You know who else prohibits firearms on their premises? The NRA and CPAC. Think about that. 

Any legislation passed by the Virginia legislature and Senate to restrict sales and possession of firearms in the Commonwealth must conform to existing US Supreme Court decisions. While the Supreme Court has held that the 2nd Amendment isn't absolute, they have set a pretty high bar that any state or local government most clear in order to restrict firearms ownership. 

So, anyone telling you that the State of Virginia is going to swoop down and seize your handgun or AR-15 or shotgun is lying to you. 

And that brings me to my final point. A lot of the memes showing up on Facebook calling for "patriots" to rally -- with their guns -- at the state capitol, or suggesting that legislators should be hung as traitors to the 2nd Amendment bear the same hallmarks as Russian-produced lies that flooded Facebook and Instagram during the 2016 election cycle. 

Please don't let our country's main enemy tear us apart any more. All these memes are lies. Whether they work or not is up to us.

Saturday, January 11, 2020

How Trump Was Able to Respond to Baghdad

There have been a number of social media posts lauding the administration's response to the attack on our Baghdad embassy, comparing it to the response to the 2012 attack on our Benghazi consulate. These posts invariably show Donald Trump in a complimentary light, versus Hillary Clinton as an indecisive, feckless leader who abandoned her people. 

So, for the record (and these are facts, not spin):

Multiple Congressional investigations -- all headed by the GOP majority -- found that the State Dept and the US Government's inability to rapidly respond to the event in Benghazi was not the fault of Hillary Clinton or Barack Obama. They identified long standing problems and shortfalls that dated back decades. 

Adequately protecting diplomatic facilities has been a concern since the 1970s at least. In 1979 our Islamabad embassy was destroyed by a mob. In 1983, our embassy in Beirut was attacked by a car bomb. In 1998, our embassies in Nairobi and Dar es Salaam were leveled by truck bombs. And so on. 

After each attack, the State Dept requested additional funds to improve embassy security. Congress repeatedly failed to fund those requests. 

The Special Purpose Marine Air Ground Task Force (or MAGTF) that was dispatched to Baghdad last week -- that the administration is doing victory laps over -- was commissioned in 2013 by the Obama administration Defense Department to provide a coherent rapid response capability for embassy security *because of Benghazi* and because they were frustrated by Congress's preference to point fingers and cast blame rather than fund an actual response capability.

So, yes, the Trump administration did respond quickly to the Baghdad embassy attack, for which they deserve credit. But they did so using a capability the Obama administration ensured they possessed.

Greenwood and the Memory Hole.

On May 30th, 1921, a young black man stepped into an elevator in the Drexel Building in downtown Tulsa, Oklahoma. Nineteen year-old Dick Rowland was on his way to the top floor to use the "Coloreds Only" bathroom. It's believed--as he got on the elevator--he stumbled and fell against the operator, a 17 year old white woman named Sarah Page. The young woman screamed and a clerk working in a first floor haberdashery claimed he saw Rowland running out of the building and that Page had been assaulted. 

Tulsa was a tinderbox. The economy was slumping, the Ku Klux Klan was on the rise, and recent oil discoveries on Osage lands were making the wrong people rich. The Osage were buying and building mansions and being chauffered by white men in large touring cars. In the Greenwood section of Tulsa, black folks were making money, opening businesses, building theaters and hospitals, and black professionals were pouring in. Greenwood became known as "The Black Wall Street."

Dick Rowland was arrested by the Tulsa police, who quickly determined he had been in the wrong place at the wrong time. Sarah Page refused to press charges. However, the police placed Rowland in protective custody because a lynch mob had formed and demanded he be turned over to them. Lynchings weren't uncommon in Oklahoma; since statehood in 1907, 26 black men had been lynched. 

In Greenwood, word of Rowland's plight spread and men gathered, determined Rowland would not be lynched. Many of the men were veterans of fighting in France, were armed and knew how to fight. Fifty to sixty men with rifles and shotguns drove to the Tulsa County Courthouse where Rowland was being held. When they arrived, they formed a skirmish line and declared they were there to assist the sheriff and his men defend the courthouse against the mob which had grown to more than 1,000.

The sight of armed black men enraged the white mob, many of whom armed themselves and set about attacking the blacks at the courthouse and marching toward Greenwood. By early morning of June 1st, 1921, Greenwood was in flames and the Greenwood massacre was fully underway. Before June 2nd dawned, Greenwood had been bombed from private aircraft and burned by rioters on foot. Initial estimates placed the dead at 36 blacks and 10 whites. Later estimates placed the number of blacks killed at 200. Today, it's accepted that the black death toll likely exceeded 300. By some estimates it was the worst race riot in American history. 

And then, it fell out of history. 

Hiding a Crime

Hiding the massacre was one of the most effective jobs of dropping something down the memory hole as happened in our history. 

My father was born in Tulsa 18 months after Greenwood was destroyed and its residents massacred. He grew up in Tulsa for his first 18 years, returning in 1952 with a young family and lived there another eight years. If he knew about the massacre, it was very incomplete and sketchy knowledge. And, he never mentioned it.

I grew up in Tulsa for my first eight years, attended early elementary grades and listened to my grandmother and great-aunts recount tales of their early years in Tulsa from 1919 on; they never hinted at the massacre 

It was likely a combination of things. The  mood in the country wasn't favorable to reporting the massacre. As a whole the United States, coming out of WWI, the Big Red Scare and the Palmer Raids, was famously seeking a "return to Normalcy." The leading Tulsa newspaper of the time deliberately  suppressed reporting, to the extent of destroying issues that addressed the event. And, for white Tulsa, since the massacre happened to black people it  wasn't worth much mention anyway. Moreover, the Klan had grown powerful in Tulsa and Oklahoma politics. Lifting the curtain on something like the Greenwood massacre was a dangerous proposition through the rest of the decade. 

As well, the full import of the massacre may have been lost in the clutter of other horrific acts of the time. There was a concerted effort to rob wealthy Osage families of their oil wealth that included  pre-meditated murder of possibly hundreds of innocents, with state, local, and federal authorities turning their backs on the crimes.

Indeed, it's hard to escape the idea that 1920's Tulsa was run as a criminal enterprise. Greenwood was one of the wealthier neighborhoods in the state (if not the country). It was full of professionals and business people and Tulsa as a whole was flush with oil money. Real estate values were high and there must have been a lot of Greenwood cash in local banks. What happened to it all? The money stolen from Osage tribal members through murder and various scams ran to millions. Of course, one of the first rules of a criminal enterprise is you don't talk about it. With a compliant newspaper and courts and an absence of anything like social media, it's easy for a story or stories like this to disappear. 

The Greenwood massacre was kept alive in the memories of surviving victims and their families. Tulsa lawyer and Greenwood resident, Buck Franklin, wrote a searing account of the events. His son who was six at the time, John Hope Franklin, became one of the leading African-American historians of our time and kept the memory alive. Over the last twenty years the city of Tulsa has begun dealing with the legacy and is now supporting efforts to locate and exhume mass graves of victims. Books and documentaries have been developed since 2000. With added attention from a recent episode of HBO's Watchmen series, the massacre is entering the country's consciousness and Greenwood's ghosts may yet get their acknowledgement.


.

Thursday, January 09, 2020

For the Record

One is left having to choose whether Vice President Mike Pence is a liar or just stupid. 

For the record; when an administration plans something like the Soleimani killing (or bin Laden's), no one expects "every member of Congress" to be briefed. There is an expectation that the "gang of eight" will be briefed (Speaker of the House, House Minority Leader, Senate Majority and Minority Leaders, House Intelligence Committee Chair and Ranking Member, and Senate Intelligence Committee Chair and Vice Chair). Trump saw fit to inform Vladimir Putin, friends and club members at Mar a Lago,  and some Congressional Republicans.  NO Democrats. He also suggested that Nancy Pelosi and Adam Schiff were security risks. 

For the record, Pelosi and Schiff have been in Congress since 1987 and 2001, respectively. For most of that time they have held the highest clearances you can hold in this country. While they have often been in opposition to the various administration they've served alongside, there has never been any indication either have been "loose-lipped" with classified material, unlike Trump who threw that canard into the mix. 

For the record, Donald Trump invited Russia's ambassador and foreign secretary into the oval office and divulged top secret code-word intelligence provided by a foreign governmentvto them, after refusing U. S. media access to the meeting (we know what happened because the Russian photographer who was allowed in worked for TASS).

For the record, Trump claimed he has authority to declassify anything he wants. He doesn't. He doesn't have the authority to declassify intelligence provided by a foreign government. Its their intelligence and they retain the perogative to classify or declassify. A U. S. President may have impunity when declassifying foreign government intelligence, but that doesn't translate to authority and it doesn't mean such irresponsibility doesn't have consequences.

But, back to Pence. I would like to give him the benefit of the doubt that he isn't lying. Let's just say he's a loyal foot soldier who doesn't know any better.